Projecting long-term armed conflict risk: An underappreciated field of inquiry?

Peer-reviewed Journal Article

de Bruin, Sophie P.; Jannis M. Hoch; Nina von Uexkull; Halvard Buhaug; Jolle Demmers; Hans Visser & Niko Wanders (2022) Projecting long-term armed conflict risk: An underappreciated field of inquiry?, Global Environmental Change 72: 102423–.

Little research has been done on projecting long-term conflict risks. Such projections are currently neither included in the development of socioeconomic scenarios or climate change impact assessments nor part of global agenda-setting policy processes. 

​In contrast, in other fields of inquiry, long-term projections and scenario studies are established and relevant for both strategical agenda-setting and applied policies. Although making projections of armed conflict risk in response to climate change is surrounded by uncertainty, there are good reasons to further develop such scenario-based projections. In this perspective article we discuss why quantifying implications of climate change for future armed conflict risk is inherently uncertain, but necessary for shaping sustainable future policy agendas. We argue that both quantitative and qualitative projections can have a purpose in future climate change impact assessments and put out the challenges this poses for future research.

Read the article here (Open Access)